Security on day one
Point Trident at a URL or repo and keep application testing in the engineering workflow — no separate security team required.
Ship fast — with a pentest that keeps up
Trident tests your app, APIs, and cloud continuously, attaches reproducible evidence to validated findings, and keeps the fix and retest in one engineering workflow.
Runs on every pull request — merge stays blocked until it's fixedPull request #184Ready to merge
feat/customer-export3 files changed
Attack surface mappedPassed
Exploit replayPassed
Cloud reachabilityPassed
Security gate complete2m 18s
How it works
From first commit to a merged fix
From the first commit to a merged fix — the pentest rides along in CI instead of waiting for a quarterly engagement.
01
Point it at your app
Give Trident a URL or connect a repo. It maps routes, auth, and the API surface.
02
Probe like an attacker
Auth, IDOR, injection, and customer-data paths get exercised across real user flows.
03
Gate the pull request
The pentest runs as a check on each PR and blocks the merge while a critical is unresolved.
04
Merge the fix
Each confirmed bug arrives as a draft PR or runbook your team can ship same-day.
Capabilities
Enterprise-grade testing, startup-sized effort
A pentest you can watch, proof you can trust, and fixes that ship — without building a security team first.
Runs in your CI
The Trident pentest posts as a status check on every pull request, so risky changes get caught before they merge.
Proven, not noisy
Findings stay in Validating until an exploit reproduces. Confirmed means proven — no triage on guesswork.
Fixes you can merge
Each confirmed bug arrives as a draft PR with a regression test — or a short runbook — so fixing it never derails the roadmap.
Cloud paths, not just the app
Connect a read-only AWS, GCP, or Azure role and Trident maps how an exposure reaches customer data, right beside the app tests.
Audit-ready early
Generate the pentest evidence buyers and SOC 2 auditors ask for, long before you can afford a dedicated team.
Outcomes
Move fast without breaking trust
Ship at startup speed with the proof — and the fixes — your customers and auditors expect.
App + cloud
One security context
Change-aware
Targeted retesting
Reproducible
Finding evidence
Fix + retest
Closure workflow
Scope
What the security review will ask for
Enterprise security questionnaires converge on a short list. This is that list.
What a startup usually actually needs
Most startups start security testing because a customer’s security review is blocking a deal, not because they chose to. That deadline shapes the right answer: a scoped penetration test with real evidence, findings a small team can actually fix, and a retest proving closure — delivered fast enough to unblock the contract, without buying an enterprise programme for a six-engineer team.
- A scoped penetration test
- Defined targets, authorization, methodology, and dates — the first thing a reviewer looks for, and the thing an automated scan report cannot substitute for.
- Evidence per finding
- Reproducible proof rather than severity labels, so your engineers can fix quickly and the reviewer can see the work was real.
- Remediation and retest
- A record that findings were fixed and verified. An open critical with a credible fix date reads better in a review than a closed one with no retest.
- Cloud configuration review
- The attack paths through your AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud accounts — usually a short list at this stage, and usually including one over-permissive CI role.
- Tenant isolation, if multi-tenant
- Whether one customer can reach another’s data. For a B2B SaaS product this is the single finding that ends a deal, and it is rarely tested before someone asks.
Frequently asked
Questions teams ask before they start
We are pre-revenue. Is this too early?
The useful trigger is your first enterprise prospect asking, or handling customer data you would be uncomfortable losing. Before that, testing is usually premature. The exception is multi-tenant isolation, which is far cheaper to fix before you have customers than after.
How fast can we get a report for a customer review?
Scoping and timelines are agreed per engagement, and the honest constraint is usually your environment readiness rather than testing capacity. Having test accounts at multiple privilege levels and a production-like staging environment ready is what actually compresses the schedule.
Do we need SOC 2 as well?
They answer different questions. SOC 2 attests that controls operated over a period; a penetration test shows whether the system resists attack now. Most enterprise reviews eventually ask for both, but a pentest is usually the faster of the two to obtain.
Our whole product is on one cloud account. Does that matter?
It concentrates blast radius — every path is short, because everything is adjacent. That is normal at this stage and worth knowing precisely rather than fixing immediately. The graph makes the actual exposure explicit so you can decide what to separate first.
Security that ships at your speed.
See a live Trident pentest reproduce a real exploit on your stack — then merge the fix in a single PR.