Estate-wide attack paths
Correlate exposure, identity, secrets, and pentest findings across every account and cloud into ranked paths to crown-jewel data.
Security that scales with the estate you actually run
Trident rolls continuous web/API pentesting and cloud attack-path mapping into one ranked view, so a sprawling, multi-business-unit estate sees the few paths that genuinely reach production data, with the governance to back it up.
AWS · Azure · GCP · Kubernetes · Snowflake · GitHub
Global estateLive context
ConsumerAWS · 418 assets
PaymentsAzure · 267 assets
DataGCP · 193 assets
Cross-unit path to exportsPublic API → CI role → production dataPriority 01
878 assets14 accounts1 ranked queue
Outcomes
Scale without the alert sprawl
Stop drowning teams in standalone alerts. Give each one the few paths that actually reach production.
Multi-cloud
Estate context
Rollup
Across business units
Owned
Findings routed to teams
Retested
After remediation
Capabilities
One platform across every account and cloud
Cloud risk and web/API pentesting in a single ranked view, built for the scale and governance an enterprise estate demands.
One graph, every business unit
Inventory assets, identities, and data stores across AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, Snowflake, and GitHub, then trace blast radius across BU and account lines.
Web & API pentesting at scale
Run auth, IDOR, access-control, business-logic, and injection tests across customer-facing apps, with reproducible evidence for validated findings.
Governance you can prove
Track SOC 2 and PCI posture against the same graph, with each control gap tied to the path it actually opens.
Ranked by real impact
Findings are prioritized by what they reach, so a 10,000-asset estate still produces a short, defensible fix list.
Routed to the owning team
Each fix ships as a draft PR, runbook, or Terraform/IAM change scoped to the owning team. Every change is human-reviewed.
How it works
From a sprawling estate to a short fix list
01
Connect every account
Attach read-only roles across clouds and subsidiaries. Trident inventories the whole estate.
02
Build the org graph
Assets, identities, secrets, and data resolve into one queryable graph that spans team boundaries.
03
Rank the real risk
Cloud exposure and web/API pentest findings collapse into ranked paths to your crown jewels.
04
Route the fix
Each path ships its choke-point fix to the owning team as a draft PR, runbook, or Terraform/IAM change.
Scope
What multi-cloud, multi-team coverage requires
The constraint is rarely the testing. It is routing the result to whoever can actually fix it.
What changes at enterprise scale
At enterprise scale the hard problem stops being detection and becomes attribution and ownership. Hundreds of accounts across several providers generate more findings than any team can action, and the same underlying defect appears in dozens of places under different names. Trident consolidates by path rather than by finding, so remediation is ranked by how many routes a single change removes.
- Cross-account and cross-provider paths
- Routes that begin in one account or provider and end in another, including the CI and identity-federation relationships that neither provider console displays as a single picture.
- Ownership routing
- Findings attributed to the team that owns the affected resource, using tags, account structure, and repository ownership, so nothing waits in a central queue for triage.
- Deduplication by root cause
- One misapplied policy template appearing in forty accounts is reported as one defect with forty instances, not forty findings competing for the same engineer.
- Business-unit segmentation
- Whether the isolation between units, subsidiaries, and acquired environments actually holds, which is where post-acquisition integration most often leaves a permanent bridge.
- Programme-level metrics
- Evidence age by critical path, change-to-test latency, and fix-to-retest latency — measures of whether the programme is working, as opposed to how busy it is.
Frequently asked
Questions teams ask before they start
How does this fit alongside our existing CNAPP or scanner?
Most enterprises keep broad scanning for hygiene and coverage obligations and use path analysis to decide what to act on first. The scanner answers what conditions exist; the graph answers which of them combine into something reachable. Findings from existing tools can be consumed as graph inputs.
Can we scope testing per business unit?
Yes. Scope, authorization, and reporting can be segmented by account structure, business unit, or environment, which matters when different units carry different regulatory obligations and different change-approval processes.
How do you avoid overwhelming teams with findings?
Two mechanisms: only reproduced findings are reported, and instances of one root cause are grouped rather than listed individually. The metric worth watching during evaluation is confirmed findings per engineer-hour of triage, not total findings.
Does it handle environments from acquisitions?
Those are usually the highest-value scope. Acquired estates typically carry unreviewed trust relationships to the parent environment, and because they were configured by a different team under different standards, they are where cross-unit isolation most often turns out to be theoretical.
See your whole estate as one graph.
Connect read-only roles across your accounts and see the ranked paths that reach production data through a read-only connection.